From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-14027-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9888 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2002 23:26:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9873 invoked by uid 71); 18 Jan 2002 23:26:01 -0000
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020118232601.9872.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: law@redhat.com
Subject: Re: bootstrap/3250: gcc 
Reply-To: law@redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00678.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3250; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: law@redhat.com
To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@mediaone.net>
Cc: jzago@ifaedi.insa-lyon.fr, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org,
        gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bootstrap/3250: gcc 
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 16:17:34 -0700

  In message <20020118170524.A7988@mediaone.net>, Craig Rodrigues writes:
  > If gcc 2.95.xx is not supported on hpux11, does that mean that
  > bootstrapping gcc 3.0 with gcc 2.95 is also not supported?
 Yes.
 
  > If so, it would probably be a good idea to add this information 
  > to the host specific install notes.
 Yes.  Can you do that for me?  
 
 Thanks,
 jeff