From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10288 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2002 22:26:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10241 invoked by uid 61); 19 Jan 2002 22:26:46 -0000 Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 14:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020119222646.10240.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, georg.wild@gmx.de, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, georg.wild@gmx.de, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailer: gnatsweb 2.9.3 Subject: Re: other/5414: Suggest using -z1 option for cvs in contrib/gcc_update X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00694.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Suggest using -z1 option for cvs in contrib/gcc_update State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: rodrigc State-Changed-When: Sat Jan 19 14:26:46 2002 State-Changed-Why: As Geoff Keating mentioned, adding -z1 to gcc_update may not be a good idea. A user can enter -z1 in the .cvsrc if they wish. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5414