From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-14044-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18968 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2002 23:06:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18940 invoked by uid 71); 19 Jan 2002 23:06:01 -0000
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 15:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020119230601.18939.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: rth@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@kettenis.dyndns.org>
Subject: Re: optimization/5290: Miscompilation of GDB on i386
Reply-To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@kettenis.dyndns.org>
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00695.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/5290; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@kettenis.dyndns.org>
To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
   gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/5290: Miscompilation of GDB on i386
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 00:03:35 +0100 (CET)

 Looks like this is fixed now.
 
 Thanks!
 
 Mark