From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30121 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2002 12:46:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30070 invoked by uid 71); 22 Jan 2002 12:46:07 -0000 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 04:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020122124607.30063.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: pb@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Richard Earnshaw Subject: Re: target/5054: [ARM/Thumb] ICE with -mlong-calls Reply-To: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00765.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/5054; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard Earnshaw To: Phil Blundell Cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/5054: [ARM/Thumb] ICE with -mlong-calls Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:44:06 +0000 > > The ARM variant uses arm_is_longcall_p in the predicate rather than > > directly testing the type cookie. I suspect the thumb variants should be > > doing the same. > > Mmm, right. A bit like this, then. Indeed. OK, assuming it solves the problem in question. R.