From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25790 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2002 19:37:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25757 invoked by uid 61); 22 Jan 2002 19:37:08 -0000 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 11:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020122193708.25756.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: fnf@ninemoons.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, pb@gcc.gnu.org From: pb@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: pb@gcc.gnu.org, fnf@ninemoons.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, pb@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailer: gnatsweb 2.9.3 Subject: Re: target/3925: Bad code generated by arm-elf-gcc with -fpic -mthumb X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00776.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Bad code generated by arm-elf-gcc with -fpic -mthumb Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->pb Responsible-Changed-By: pb Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Jan 22 11:37:07 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: . State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: pb State-Changed-When: Tue Jan 22 11:37:07 2002 State-Changed-Why: Not a bug, as far as I can see. Or rather, I think GCC is within its rights to generate these instructions and the assembler is at fault for rejecting them. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3925