From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11801 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2002 21:16:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11760 invoked by uid 71); 22 Jan 2002 21:16:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020122211601.11757.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: pb@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: target/2309: [ARM] SUBREG in memory reference Reply-To: Philip Blundell X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00783.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/2309; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Philip Blundell To: bernds@redhat.com, richard.earnshaw@arm.com Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/2309: [ARM] SUBREG in memory reference Date: 22 Jan 2002 20:48:23 +0000 Does anybody know what the status of this is now? I don't seem to have a copy of the original testcase any more, and the one in GNATS appears to be corrupt, so I can't easily test whether the bug still happens. (Even if I did have that testcase, I guess there's a good chance that it would no longer generate the problematic RTL in any case From a quick look at GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS in arm.h from the 3.0 branch, it seems to me that it's still not prepared to handle SUBREGs in memory expressions.