From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-14154-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13241 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2002 23:36:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13208 invoked by uid 71); 22 Jan 2002 23:36:01 -0000
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020122233601.13206.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: billingd@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "Billinghurst, David \(CRTS\)" <David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com>
Subject: Re: fortran/3392: ICE in function_arg, at config/mips/mips.c:4007
Reply-To: "Billinghurst, David \(CRTS\)" <David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00805.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR fortran/3392; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" <David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com>
To: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>,
	<toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: fortran/3392: ICE in function_arg, at config/mips/mips.c:4007
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 07:29:04 +0800

 I some more information on this.  I strongly suspect that the patch that =
 causes the problem is:
 
 2001-05-03 Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
 Re-installed 2001-01-09's patch:
 * hwint.h (HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT, HOST_WIDE_INT): Use long long
 if it's wider than long and the target's long is wider than the
 host's.=20
 
 
 See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2001-05/msg00112.html, which suggests =
 that may expose latent bugs for 32-bit > 64-bit cross-compilation - =
 exactly the problem we are seeing - and suggests some fixes.  The patch =
 went in at 2001-05-03 11:58:43 UTC, and broke irix bootstrap.  A gcc =
 from just prior does not fail the tests. =20