From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2328 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2002 10:26:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2314 invoked by uid 71); 23 Jan 2002 10:26:02 -0000 Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 02:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020123102602.2313.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: pb@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Richard Earnshaw Subject: Re: target/2309: [ARM] SUBREG in memory reference Reply-To: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00821.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/2309; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard Earnshaw To: Philip Blundell Cc: bernds@redhat.com, richard.earnshaw@arm.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/2309: [ARM] SUBREG in memory reference Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 10:23:17 +0000 > Does anybody know what the status of this is now? > > I don't seem to have a copy of the original testcase any more, and the > one in GNATS appears to be corrupt, so I can't easily test whether the > bug still happens. (Even if I did have that testcase, I guess there's a > good chance that it would no longer generate the problematic RTL in any > case > > From a quick look at GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS in arm.h from the 3.0 > branch, it seems to me that it's still not prepared to handle SUBREGs in > memory expressions. > > I have the original post as sent out by gnats, but I can't even extract the testcase from that. So I think it must either have been corrupted right up front, or have been a bad attachment in the first place. However, sleuthing shows that the problem may have been fixed: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-04/msg00131.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/1999-06/msg00419.html R.