public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ro@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, kreckel@ginac.de, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE, ro@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/5505: Doubts about a patch for OSF Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 06:14:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20020130141419.19237.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) Synopsis: Doubts about a patch for OSF Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->ro Responsible-Changed-By: ro Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jan 30 06:14:19 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: Mine. State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: ro State-Changed-When: Wed Jan 30 06:14:19 2002 State-Changed-Why: Please follow the bug reporting instructions at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html and include all the required information (especially how GCC was configured and a self-contained test case). Without a testcase demonstrating the problem, I cannot reproduce or fix this. as, ar, or nm messages out of context (i.e. without the corresponding source files) don't help here. Besides, I've been able to build and test CLN 1.1.4 on alpha-dec-osf5.1 with a copy a gcc 3.0.2 prerelease without any problems, i.e. make and make check both complete sucessfully. The problem may therefore be due not to a gcc problem but to a as or ld bug. The machine used here is running Tru64 UNIX V5.1 with Patch Kit 3 installed. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5505
next reply other threads:[~2002-01-30 14:14 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2002-01-30 6:14 ro [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2002-05-10 5:36 Rainer Orth 2002-05-10 5:27 ro 2002-05-09 10:56 Richard B. Kreckel 2002-04-16 10:56 Rainer Orth 2002-02-25 8:58 Rainer Orth 2002-02-23 14:12 Richard B. Kreckel 2002-02-22 15:46 Rainer Orth 2002-02-22 14:16 Rainer Orth 2002-02-21 16:21 Richard B. Kreckel 2002-02-20 9:36 Richard B. Kreckel 2002-02-19 5:26 Rainer Orth 2002-02-18 12:56 Richard B. Kreckel 2002-02-04 11:06 Rainer Orth 2002-02-04 11:06 Richard B. Kreckel 2002-01-27 6:26 kreckel
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20020130141419.19237.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=ro@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=kreckel@ginac.de \ --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).