From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4207 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2002 23:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4193 invoked by uid 71); 30 Jan 2002 23:36:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020130233600.4192.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Tom Tromey Subject: Re: java/5537: Error compiling simple bytecode with jsr Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg01062.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR java/5537; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tom Tromey To: Daniel.Bonniot@inria.fr Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: java/5537: Error compiling simple bytecode with jsr Date: 30 Jan 2002 16:54:16 -0700 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Bonniot writes: Daniel> This case involves calling return in a try/finally block, Daniel> and compiling from bytecode. I've looked at this. gcj still rejects the bytecode in this PR. I think it does so incorrectly; the bytecode looks fine to me and both `java' and `gij' pass it. How did you generate the bytecode? If you did so with gcj, note that gcj 3.1 no longer generates the same bytecode. Now the method is simply `return'. (This doesn't affect the fact that this is a gcj bug.) Tom