From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6871 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2002 03:22:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6846 invoked by uid 61); 31 Jan 2002 03:22:17 -0000 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 19:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020131032217.6845.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, george.r.goffe@seagate.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, george.r.goffe@seagate.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailer: gnatsweb 2.9.3 Subject: Re: other/5549: compiling bind-9.2.0 on solaris 2.8; X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg01071.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: compiling bind-9.2.0 on solaris 2.8; State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: rodrigc State-Changed-When: Wed Jan 30 19:22:16 2002 State-Changed-Why: Can you submit preprocessed source (remember reading http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html ?) and the compilation flags you used to recreate the problem? That's how we like our bug reports, George. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5549