From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10853 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2002 11:56:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10808 invoked by uid 71); 8 Feb 2002 11:56:02 -0000 Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 03:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020208115602.10804.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Tim Small Subject: Re: target/3947: [MIPS] MIPS multiple inheritance - thunk causes two destructor calls Reply-To: Tim Small X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00203.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/3947; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tim Small To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, simong@oz.agile.tv Cc: Subject: Re: target/3947: [MIPS] MIPS multiple inheritance - thunk causes two destructor calls Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 11:51:15 +0000 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3947 This bug should prob be reclassified as non-architecture dependent, as we are seeing this bug (or at least one with the same effect) on i386. Is it worth us trying to whittle down to the smallest code snippet necessary to reproduce this (we are working with a fairly large closed source base so this may be quite time consuming - no problem doing it, but wanted to check if it is actually going to be useful?). Cheers, Tim.