From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3065 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2002 03:02:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3033 invoked by uid 61); 11 Feb 2002 03:02:33 -0000 Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 19:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020211030233.3031.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gandalf@winds.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, neil@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: rth@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gandalf@winds.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, neil@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailer: gnatsweb 2.9.3 Subject: Re: c/5593: GCC miscompiles bitshifts on unsigned struct members when creating a 64-bit value X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00248.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: GCC miscompiles bitshifts on unsigned struct members when creating a 64-bit value Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->neil Responsible-Changed-By: rth Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Feb 10 19:02:32 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: Pretty sure this is more fodder for your bitfield patch. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5593