From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-14745-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3820 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2002 18:26:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3759 invoked by uid 71); 12 Feb 2002 18:26:02 -0000
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020212182602.3751.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco@cygnus.com>
Subject: Re: java/5668: finit$ not called while using a constructor
Reply-To: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00284.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR java/5668; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco@cygnus.com>
To: toddastock@yahoo.com
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: java/5668: finit$ not called while using a constructor
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:22:59 -0800 (PST)

 toddastock@yahoo.com writes:
 
 > If you have a constructor in your Java class the finit$ is not
 > inserted after the super call.  If you omit the constructor all is
 > fine.
 
 Are you seeing this when going native or bytecode?
 
 ./A