From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1912 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2002 22:46:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1881 invoked by uid 71); 18 Feb 2002 22:46:03 -0000 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 14:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020218224603.1870.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Nathan Sidwell Subject: Re: other/5718: Inconsistent and backwards incompatible handling of '-o' switch. Reply-To: Nathan Sidwell X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00447.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR other/5718; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nathan Sidwell To: Neil Booth Cc: Zack Weinberg , gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, osv@javad.ru, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: other/5718: Inconsistent and backwards incompatible handling of '-o' switch. Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 22:42:22 +0000 Neil, > * gcc.c (cpp_unique_options): Treat -o as indicating object file > only if not -E. If -E, pass -o through to the preprocessor. this looks right to me. Of course the big incompatibility is PR 3951 :-( nathan -- Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC 'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?' nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org