From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10603 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2002 23:46:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10551 invoked by uid 71); 18 Feb 2002 23:46:08 -0000 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 15:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020218234607.10548.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: ljrittle@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Andrew Pollard Subject: Re: libstdc++/5432: Implementation still not thread-safe on multiprocessor machines Reply-To: Andrew Pollard X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00452.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/5432; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andrew Pollard To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: andrew@andypo.net, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, ljrittle@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/5432: Implementation still not thread-safe on multiprocessor machines Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 23:34:46 GMT >Synopsis: Implementation still not thread-safe on multiprocessor machines > >State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed >State-Changed-By: rodrigc >State-Changed-When: Sun Feb 17 18:54:57 2002 >State-Changed-Why: > Fixed in recent gcc 3.1 snapshots. > >http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5432 Cheers. I have verified that the 3.1 source "works as expected". Shame it couldn't make it into gcc-3.0.4, I'll just have to patch locally once gcc-3.0.4 is out... Andrew. -- Andrew Pollard, ASI/Brooks Automation | home: andrew@andypo.net 670 Eskdale Road, Winnersh Triangle, UK | work: Andrew.Pollard@brooks.com Tel/Fax:+44 (0)118 9215603 / 9215660 | http://www.andypo.net