From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25796 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2002 03:05:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25752 invoked by uid 61); 24 Feb 2002 03:05:51 -0000 Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 19:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020224030551.25751.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gp@iws.it, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gp@iws.it, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailer: gnatsweb 2.9.3 Subject: Re: optimization/3446: a bug already seen in gcc 2.95.[12] now in gcc 3.0 X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00647.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: a bug already seen in gcc 2.95.[12] now in gcc 3.0 State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed State-Changed-By: rodrigc State-Changed-When: Sat Feb 23 19:05:50 2002 State-Changed-Why: Problem reproduced in gcc 3.0.4, but does not occur with gcc version 3.1 20020217 (experimental) http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3446