From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29263 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2002 02:36:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29230 invoked by uid 61); 27 Feb 2002 02:36:51 -0000 Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 18:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020227023651.29229.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, stucki@math.fu-berlin.de From: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, stucki@math.fu-berlin.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailer: gnatsweb 2.9.3 Subject: Re: optimization/4847: Optimizer on Sparc breaks routine-calls in vim60 X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00752.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Optimizer on Sparc breaks routine-calls in vim60 State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: rodrigc State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 26 18:36:50 2002 State-Changed-Why: Can you reproduce this with gcc 3.0.4? Can you provide a smaller, reproduceable testcase as described in the guidelines at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html? http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=4847