public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: preprocessor/5806: The preprocessor evaluates expression s in 64-bit, violating IS C++ 16.1.4 Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 15:16:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20020301231601.19030.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/5806; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> To: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com> Cc: eric_dana@bmc.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, dick_schoeller@bmc.com Subject: Re: preprocessor/5806: The preprocessor evaluates expression s in 64-bit, violating IS C++ 16.1.4 Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 23:13:14 +0000 Zack Weinberg wrote:- > The preprocessor ought to do this only in C99 mode; in C++ and > presumably also C89 mode (I don't have a copy of C89 to check) it > should use long/unsigned long, which may be 32 bits wide on some > targets. Unfortunately, doing this properly requires substantial > changes to GCC, which are planned, but not currently practical. > (We're already not quite compliant; preprocessor arithmetic uses the > _host's_ idea of intmax_t, not the target's.) > > Neil - as a stopgap, it occurs to me that we could mask intermediate > values down to 32 bits when in C89/C++ mode and sizeof(target unsigned > long) == 4. Thoughts? Sounds OK to me. Like you, I have the C++ and C99 standards, but no C89 lying around. I do believe that the C++ preprocessor section was copied almost verbatim (with some changes for bool and true / false) from C89 though. Neil.
next reply other threads:[~2002-03-01 23:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2002-03-01 15:16 Neil Booth [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2002-08-05 15:26 Dana, Eric 2002-08-03 0:56 'Zack Weinberg' 2002-05-27 13:35 neil 2002-05-26 12:16 neil 2002-03-25 0:53 neil 2002-03-15 8:56 Dana, Eric 2002-03-14 15:16 'Zack Weinberg' 2002-03-14 13:06 'Neil Booth' 2002-03-14 13:06 Dana, Eric 2002-03-14 11:46 Zack Weinberg 2002-03-01 13:36 Zack Weinberg 2002-03-01 12:16 eric_dana
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20020301231601.19030.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).