public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: preprocessor/5806: The preprocessor evaluates expression s in 64-bit, violating IS C++ 16.1.4
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 15:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020301231601.19030.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/5806; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Cc: eric_dana@bmc.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, dick_schoeller@bmc.com
Subject: Re: preprocessor/5806: The preprocessor evaluates expression s in 64-bit, violating IS C++ 16.1.4
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 23:13:14 +0000

 Zack Weinberg wrote:-
 
 > The preprocessor ought to do this only in C99 mode; in C++ and
 > presumably also C89 mode (I don't have a copy of C89 to check) it
 > should use long/unsigned long, which may be 32 bits wide on some
 > targets.  Unfortunately, doing this properly requires substantial
 > changes to GCC, which are planned, but not currently practical.
 > (We're already not quite compliant; preprocessor arithmetic uses the
 > _host's_ idea of intmax_t, not the target's.)
 > 
 > Neil - as a stopgap, it occurs to me that we could mask intermediate
 > values down to 32 bits when in C89/C++ mode and sizeof(target unsigned
 > long) == 4.  Thoughts?
 
 Sounds OK to me.  Like you, I have the C++ and C99 standards, but no C89
 lying around.  I do believe that the C++ preprocessor section was copied
 almost verbatim (with some changes for bool and true / false) from C89
 though.
 
 Neil.


             reply	other threads:[~2002-03-01 23:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-01 15:16 Neil Booth [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-05 15:26 Dana, Eric
2002-08-03  0:56 'Zack Weinberg'
2002-05-27 13:35 neil
2002-05-26 12:16 neil
2002-03-25  0:53 neil
2002-03-15  8:56 Dana, Eric
2002-03-14 15:16 'Zack Weinberg'
2002-03-14 13:06 'Neil Booth'
2002-03-14 13:06 Dana, Eric
2002-03-14 11:46 Zack Weinberg
2002-03-01 13:36 Zack Weinberg
2002-03-01 12:16 eric_dana

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020301231601.19030.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).