From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32698 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2002 18:14:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32660 invoked by uid 61); 3 Mar 2002 18:14:37 -0000 Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 10:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020303181437.32658.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, traveler@netti.fi From: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, traveler@netti.fi, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailer: gnatsweb 2.9.3 Subject: Re: c++/5797: "GCC 3.04 produces internal error 108" X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00068.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: "GCC 3.04 produces internal error 108" State-Changed-From-To: feedback->analyzed State-Changed-By: rodrigc State-Changed-When: Sun Mar 3 10:14:36 2002 State-Changed-Why: I can reproduce your error (I need to change the typedef for size_t from "long unsigned int" to "unsigned int" in order to compile under Linux). With gcc 3.1 20020217 (experimental), the code compiles, but I get the following warnings: function.h:275: warning: `typename ArithmeticFunction::Overflow' is implicitly a typename function.h:275: warning: implicit typename is deprecated, please see the documentation for details function.h:275: warning: `typename ArithmeticFunction::Underflow' is implicitly a typename function.h:275: warning: implicit typename is deprecated, please see the documentation for details function.h:285: warning: `typename ArithmeticFunction::Overflow' is implicitly a typename function.h:285: warning: implicit typename is deprecated, please see the documentation for details function.h:285: warning: `typename ArithmeticFunction::Underflow' is implicitly a typename function.h:285: warning: implicit typename is deprecated, please see the documentation for details I can get rid of the warnings with the patch which I have attached to this PR, jee.patch.txt, but it still will not compile with gcc 3.0.4: So, while this still looks like a problem in gcc 3.0.4, it looks fixed in gcc 3.1 20020217 (experimental). http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5797