From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5419 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2002 15:46:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5365 invoked by uid 71); 4 Mar 2002 15:46:04 -0000 Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 07:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020304154604.5361.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Phil Edwards Subject: Re: c++/5821: Solaris: C++ compiler defines _XOPEN_SOURCE Reply-To: Phil Edwards X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00119.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/5821; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Phil Edwards To: dpo@club-internet.fr Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/5821: Solaris: C++ compiler defines _XOPEN_SOURCE Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 10:45:49 -0500 > The problem is that one should not be defining > _XOPEN_SOURCE just because it's practical, for > example for building libstdc++. This is a bad > hack. It's not "practical". It's "required". As in, if it's not defined, nothing works. This has been discussed to death on the mailing lists. See the archives before resubmitting the same bug report. -- If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams