From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16832 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2002 16:46:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16773 invoked by uid 71); 11 Mar 2002 16:46:02 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 08:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020311164601.16770.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: jakub@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Janis Johnson Subject: Re: middle-end/5877: negative offset to array index leads to inefficient code Reply-To: Janis Johnson X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00344.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR middle-end/5877; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Janis Johnson To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jakub@gcc.gnu.org, janis187@us.ibm.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: middle-end/5877: negative offset to array index leads to inefficient code Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 08:49:41 -0800 On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 07:13:56PM -0000, rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org wrote: > Synopsis: negative offset to array index leads to inefficient code > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: rodrigc > State-Changed-When: Sun Mar 10 11:13:56 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > Can you verify if this solves the problem? > > > > 2002-03-09 Jakub Jelinek > > PR middle-end/5877 > * expr.c (highest_pow2_factor): Check TREE_INT_CST_LOW > even for non-representable constants. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5877 Yes, it does. Thanks, Jakub! Janis