From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10174 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2002 22:06:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10149 invoked by uid 71); 11 Mar 2002 22:06:02 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020311220602.10144.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "John David Anglin" Subject: Re: libstdc++/4260: ABI change beween 3.0 and 3.0.1 Reply-To: "John David Anglin" X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00362.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/4260; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "John David Anglin" To: phil@jaj.com (Phil Edwards) Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, dave.anglin@nrc.ca, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/4260: ABI change beween 3.0 and 3.0.1 Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:02:57 -0500 (EST) > You wrote in the audit trail for this PR that this is now okay. Can we > close the PR? Was any code changed to keep the library internal name and global constructors for the library consistent? If not, the problem is likely to occur again. It's quite annoying to have to rebuild all apps linked against the library when you ugrade gcc. That's why I didn't close the PR when I added to the audit trail. Dave -- J. David Anglin dave.anglin@nrc.ca National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)