public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
To: toon@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: c/5914: Infinite loop when compiling with optimisation on of z_log.c  of libf2c
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:06:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020313220602.21886.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

The following reply was made to PR c/5914; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
To: Ulrich Jakobus <jakobus@emss.co.za>
Cc: "gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
 	"gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
 	"gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
 	"nobody@gcc.gnu.org" <nobody@gcc.gnu.org>,
 	"toon@gcc.gnu.org" <toon@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: c/5914: Infinite loop when compiling with optimisation on of z_log.c 
 of libf2c
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 21:04:38 +0100

 Ulrich Jakobus wrote:
 
 > I wrote:
 
 > >Ah, now I see - you really meant this a *C* bug report :-)
 
 > Yes, I meant this to be a *C* bug of the optimiser (and I
 > submitted it as a C bug). Obviously the created code with
 > -O2 or -O3 is not correct, resulting in an infinite loop.
 > Compiling exactly the same code with -O works, and also
 > using e.g. gcc-2.95.2 with -O2 or -O3 works fine.
 
 Oh, perhaps you think that this is a regression w.r.t. 2.95.2 - it
 isn't.  The fact that 2.95.2 happened to compile this "correctly" is
 purely by chance.  In general, if you code a floating point
 fixed-point-finder by comparing one estimate with the other for
 equality, you'll lose on such targets as the x86, because it keeps
 variables in registers with a different precision than the corresponding
 memory location.
 
 -ffloat-store is the flag to use to circumvent this problem.
 
 -- 
 Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
 Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
 Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
 Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)


             reply	other threads:[~2002-03-13 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-13 14:06 Toon Moene [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-16  7:56 toon
2002-03-12 21:06 Ulrich Jakobus
2002-03-12 13:06 Toon Moene
2002-03-11 21:16 Ulrich Jakobus
2002-03-11 13:59 toon
2002-03-11 13:16 Tim Prince
2002-03-11  7:56 jakobus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020313220602.21886.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=toon@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).