Re: optimization/5968: flow.c ICE compiling 254.gap on ia64 with -O2 -funroll-loops

[Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>]

The following reply was made to PR optimization/5968; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>
To: jakub@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
        janis187@us.ibm.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/5968: flow.c ICE compiling 254.gap on ia64 with -O2 -funroll-loops
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 11:00:58 -0800

 On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 01:44:31PM -0000, jakub@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 > Synopsis: flow.c ICE compiling 254.gap on ia64 with -O2 -funroll-loops
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 > State-Changed-By: jakub
 > State-Changed-When: Fri Mar 15 05:44:30 2002
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     Are you sure you had my patch installed?
 >     Cannot reproduce it today at all and it really looks
 >     like 5891.
 > 
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5968
 
 OK, I'm embarrassed.  I updated my 3.1 tree yesterday and built and ran
 200.sixtrack and 254.gap; 200.sixtrack built and ran fine, so I assumed
 that I had picked up Jakub's patch, but it turns out I didn't.  Today I
 updated the tree again, verified that his patch is there, and both tests
 work fine.  Sorry for the confusion, PR 5968 is the same as PR 5891.
 
 I also saw runtime failures with 254.gap on i686-pc-linux.gnu, and with
 Jakub's fix for 5891 it now works fine.  I plan to continue building and
 running (with the small test input) SPEC CPU2000 benchmarks with a
 variety of optimization options and tracking down and reporting
 failures.
 
 Janis