From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23179 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2002 19:39:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23131 invoked by uid 61); 17 Mar 2002 19:39:29 -0000 Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 11:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020317193929.23129.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: Andre.dos.Anjos@cern.ch, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gdr@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: paolo@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org, Andre.dos.Anjos@cern.ch, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gdr@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailer: gnatsweb 2.9.3 Subject: Re: libstdc++/5801: valarray doesn't work as expected with complex types X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00606.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: valarray doesn't work as expected with complex types Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->gdr Responsible-Changed-By: paolo Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Mar 17 11:39:27 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: Valarray maintainer. State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: paolo State-Changed-When: Sun Mar 17 11:39:27 2002 State-Changed-Why: Gaby, I'm assigning this to you. I have reproduced the seg fault on i686-pc-linux-gnu with 3.0.4, 3.1 pre, 3.2 exp, /not/ with 2.95.3. Therefore, if you can confirm that the code is indeed legal this is a serious regression. Ciao, Paolo. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5801