From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-15865-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3754 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2002 09:56:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3730 invoked by uid 71); 18 Mar 2002 09:56:00 -0000
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 01:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020318095600.3729.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Richard Hirst <rhirst@linuxcare.com>
Subject: Re: c/5974: gcc 3.0.4 generates bad code to reference ((packed)) struct
Reply-To: Richard Hirst <rhirst@linuxcare.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00633.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/5974; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Hirst <rhirst@linuxcare.com>
To: jakub@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/5974: gcc 3.0.4 generates bad code to reference ((packed)) struct
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 09:32:44 +0000

 Hi,
   Are fixed versions of 2.96 and 3.0 likely to appear, or do I have to
 code round the problem until 3.1+ becomes the standard compiler?
 
 Thanks,
   Richard
 
 On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 02:10:20PM -0000, jakub@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 > Synopsis: gcc 3.0.4 generates bad code to reference ((packed)) struct
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
 > State-Changed-By: jakub
 > State-Changed-When: Fri Mar 15 06:10:20 2002
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     This was fixed in gcc 3.1 by
 >     http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-08/msg01072.html
 > 
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5974