From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9136 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2002 21:41:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9092 invoked by uid 61); 18 Mar 2002 21:41:50 -0000 Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 13:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020318214150.9091.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: aj@suse.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jakub@redhat.com, rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, aj@suse.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jakub@redhat.com, rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailer: gnatsweb 2.9.3 Subject: Re: optimization/5200: Store Motion is broken X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00679.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Store Motion is broken State-Changed-From-To: closed->feedback State-Changed-By: rodrigc State-Changed-When: Mon Mar 18 13:41:47 2002 State-Changed-Why: Jakub, according to Andreas, this problem is fixed on the gcc 3.1 branch by your patch, but not on the mainline. Care to comment? http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5200