From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22002 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2002 22:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21981 invoked by uid 71); 18 Mar 2002 22:06:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020318220601.21980.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Jakub Jelinek Subject: Re: optimization/5200: Store Motion is broken Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00681.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/5200; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jakub Jelinek To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, aj@suse.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/5200: Store Motion is broken Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:03:31 -0500 On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 09:41:50PM -0000, rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org wrote: > Jakub, according to Andreas, this problem is > fixed on the gcc 3.1 branch by your patch, but not on the mainline. > > Care to comment? On mainline IMHO it should be fixed the hard way, ie. apply the patch to fix store motion checks and then work out how to fix all store motion bugs. This is not possible for the branch, since when sm basically never worked in 3.1 development cycle, it would be actually a completely new feature coming in hard feature freeze. Jakub