From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8500 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2002 22:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8466 invoked by uid 71); 18 Mar 2002 22:36:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020318223601.8465.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Toon Moene Subject: Re: optimization/5999: ICE for complex*16 divide with -ffast-math on ia64 Reply-To: Toon Moene X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00683.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/5999; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Toon Moene To: janis187@us.ibm.com Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/5999: ICE for complex*16 divide with -ffast-math on ia64 Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 23:27:58 +0100 janis187@us.ibm.com wrote: > >Number: 5999 > >Category: optimization > GCC 3.1 gets a segmentation violation compiling 301.apsi > and 168.wupwise from SPEC CPU2000 with "-O2 -ffast-math" on > ia64-unknown-linux-gnu. In both cases this occurs for a > divide of a complex*16 variable when expand_expr passes a > NULL op0 to expand_binop, which in turn passes it to > protect_from_queue. This might be a duplicate of middle-end/5731. -- Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290 Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)