From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-15936-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9378 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2002 12:06:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9331 invoked by uid 71); 19 Mar 2002 12:06:02 -0000
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 04:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020319120602.9325.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: pb@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
Subject: Re: target/3925: [ARM/Thumb] Assembler chokes on branches with 
 (PLT)
Reply-To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00704.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR target/3925; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: Philip Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>
Cc: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, pb@gcc.gnu.org,
        fnf@ninemoons.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: target/3925: [ARM/Thumb] Assembler chokes on branches with 
 (PLT)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:55:57 +0000

 > There's no reason that -k couldn't cause the assembler to emit all
 > branches as PLT32 relocs rather than PC24.  It just happens that Pat and
 > Scott chose to follow the example of the i386-linux port, where the
 > assembler just ignores -k altogether and the compiler adds "@plt"
 > decorations to call instructions.
 
 OK, so that clears up that side of the problem.  Now, what about the issue 
 that PLT32 and ARM24 aren't really different relocs?
 
 R.