From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12556 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2002 14:16:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12503 invoked by uid 71); 19 Mar 2002 14:16:08 -0000 Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 06:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020319141608.12497.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: jason@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Jason Merrill Subject: Re: c++/2447: g++ don't handle execption when using with -fomit-frame-pointer Reply-To: Jason Merrill X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00709.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/2447; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jason Merrill To: Gwenole Beauchesne Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/2447: g++ don't handle execption when using with -fomit-frame-pointer Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 14:10:21 +0000 >>>>> "Gwenole" == Gwenole Beauchesne writes: > On 20 Feb 2002 jason@gcc.gnu.org wrote: >> Synopsis: g++ don't handle execption when using with -fomit-frame-pointer > [...] >> There is a patch for this bug at >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-02/msg01301.html > Thank you Jason, this fixes this bug for 3.0.4. However, PR c++/5246 and > PR c++/3754 (similar problems with -fomit-frame-pointer) are not affected > with the patch. i.e. they still fail. Could you please have a look? On a closer look, I see that these problems are too complex to be fixed in the 3.0 series. If you're using EH, you need to specify either -maccumulate-outgoing-args or -fno-omit-frame-pointer. I'm working on a fix for 3.1. Jason