From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27025 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2002 18:16:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26895 invoked by uid 71); 20 Mar 2002 18:16:09 -0000 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 10:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020320181607.26879.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Neil Booth Subject: Re: c++/6001: g++ problems with nested headers from > egcs-2.91.66 until 3.0.0 Reply-To: Neil Booth X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00764.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/6001; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Neil Booth To: Mario Deilmann Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/6001: g++ problems with nested headers from > egcs-2.91.66 until 3.0.0 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 18:13:01 +0000 Mario Deilmann wrote:- > I tried gcc -E -H on both files and there are a LOT of differences (about > 1200). I have looked into the differences and most of them obviously are > caused by the different include sequence. > > I have no idea where I should look for the important differences ? Any > idea ? Try gcc file.c -E -H > /dev/null which just lists the header trail. Then have a look at the first header where they diverge, and figure out why. It's either because your path is different, or a command line or builtin macro is different. I can't help you any more than that I'm afraid. Neil.