From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8885 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2002 15:12:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8852 invoked by uid 61); 21 Mar 2002 15:12:53 -0000 Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 07:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020321151253.8851.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de From: jakub@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: jakub@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailer: gnatsweb 2.9.3 Subject: Re: c++/5504: Optimization breaks wei-ku-1 from blitz X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00800.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Optimization breaks wei-ku-1 from blitz State-Changed-From-To: feedback->analyzed State-Changed-By: jakub State-Changed-When: Thu Mar 21 07:12:52 2002 State-Changed-Why: I tried to simplify this, but only managed to cut it down from ~2M to ~1.5M so far. Anyway, it seems like gcc 3.1 up to 20011127 inclusive eat ~ 36MB of memory on this while 20011231 snapshot takes already ~ 250MB at optimize_sibling_and_tail_recursive_calls time. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5504