From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31472 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2002 23:46:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31422 invoked by uid 71); 21 Mar 2002 23:46:04 -0000 Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 15:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020321234604.31413.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Craig Rodrigues Subject: Re: bootstrap/5167: gcc-3.0.2 fails to bootstrap on Solaris 2.6 Reply-To: Craig Rodrigues X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00814.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/5167; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Craig Rodrigues To: Steven Sabean Cc: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: bootstrap/5167: gcc-3.0.2 fails to bootstrap on Solaris 2.6 Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 18:43:58 -0500 On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 03:21:26PM -0700, Steven Sabean wrote: > Seems like a good way to keep the number of open bugs to a minimum is to close > them without investigating at all, right? I don't care for your tone. Unlike you, I don't get paid by Sun to do this work, and am strictly a volunteer for the GCC project. So try to be nice. > Why don't you try following the link to the "successful build report" you > mention? > > You might notice that there is no report of a successful build of gcc-3.0.2 on > Solaris 2.6. There is a successful build report of gcc 3.0.4 on Solaris 2.6. gcc 3.0.4 has bugfixes on top of gcc 3.0.2. So, this bug report is not worth keeping open in my opinion. -- Craig Rodrigues http://www.gis.net/~craigr rodrigc@attbi.com