From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7519 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2002 00:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7496 invoked by uid 71); 22 Mar 2002 00:06:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 16:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020322000601.7495.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Steven Sabean Subject: Re: bootstrap/5167: gcc-3.0.2 fails to bootstrap on Solaris 2.6 Reply-To: Steven Sabean X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00815.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/5167; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Steven Sabean To: Steven.Sabean@sun.com, rodrigc@attbi.com Cc: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: bootstrap/5167: gcc-3.0.2 fails to bootstrap on Solaris 2.6 Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 16:58:31 -0700 (MST) > To: Steven Sabean > Cc: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: bootstrap/5167: gcc-3.0.2 fails to bootstrap on Solaris 2.6 > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Disposition: inline > User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 03:21:26PM -0700, Steven Sabean wrote: > > Seems like a good way to keep the number of open bugs to a minimum is to close > > them without investigating at all, right? > > I don't care for your tone. Unlike you, I don't get paid by Sun > to do this work, and am strictly a volunteer for the GCC project. > So try to be nice. > I apologize. I found it incredibly frustrating to have a bug report closed without anyone ever even trying to reproduce the problem. > > Why don't you try following the link to the "successful build report" you > > mention? > > > > You might notice that there is no report of a successful build of gcc-3.0.2 on > > Solaris 2.6. > > There is a successful build report of gcc 3.0.4 on Solaris 2.6. > > gcc 3.0.4 has bugfixes on top of gcc 3.0.2. > So, this bug report is not worth keeping open in my opinion. Fair enough. But why not just state that gcc-3.0.2 is no longer supported? > > -- > Craig Rodrigues > http://www.gis.net/~craigr > rodrigc@attbi.com -Steve Sabean Sun Microsystems