From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2131 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2002 18:14:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2093 invoked by uid 61); 22 Mar 2002 18:14:18 -0000 Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020322181417.2082.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: dnovillo@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de From: jakub@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: jakub@gcc.gnu.org, dnovillo@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailer: gnatsweb 2.9.3 Subject: Re: c++/5504: Optimization breaks wei-ku-1 from blitz X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00848.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Optimization breaks wei-ku-1 from blitz State-Changed-From-To: feedback->analyzed State-Changed-By: jakub State-Changed-When: Fri Mar 22 10:14:16 2002 State-Changed-Why: I've narrowed this down to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-12/msg01532.html Without it, cc1plus takes < 69M on the original wei-ku-1.ii, with it it takes gobs of RAM. Touch happily will leave further investigation on you. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5504