From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3026 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2002 13:36:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3010 invoked by uid 71); 25 Mar 2002 13:36:02 -0000 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 05:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020325133602.3009.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Baker, Rick" Subject: RE: c++/5836: GCC 3.0.3 fails when compiling inline instructions with 16-bit ARM code. Reply-To: "Baker, Rick" X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00921.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/5836; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Baker, Rick" To: "'rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org'" , "'gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org'" , "'gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org'" , "'nobody@gcc.gnu.org'" , "Baker, Rick" , "'rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org'" , "'gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org'" Cc: Subject: RE: c++/5836: GCC 3.0.3 fails when compiling inline instructions with 16-bit ARM code. Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 08:33:02 -0500 All, Sorry for the delay, I had to recreate the setup. The patch help one of the problems mentioned with Thumb code and -mlong-calls. I do not have time to verify it fixed all the issues. Tell me, how can I search for these issues on my own next time. I did the usual searches and found no hits on this subject? Anyways...thank-you for your time and effort. Rick Baker -----Original Message----- From: rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 6:40 AM To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org; nobody@gcc.gnu.org; Baker, Rick; rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/5836: GCC 3.0.3 fails when compiling inline instructions with 16-bit ARM code. Synopsis: GCC 3.0.3 fails when compiling inline instructions with 16-bit ARM code. Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->rearnsha Responsible-Changed-By: rearnsha Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Mar 22 03:40:10 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: Mine State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: rearnsha State-Changed-When: Fri Mar 22 03:40:10 2002 State-Changed-Why: This appears to be a duplicate of PR 5054. Could you please apply the following patch and tell me if it fixes the problem. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/2002-01/msg00766.html http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p r=5836