From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5233 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2002 13:46:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5217 invoked by uid 71); 25 Mar 2002 13:46:04 -0000 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 05:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020325134604.5214.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Richard Earnshaw Subject: Re: c++/5836: GCC 3.0.3 fails when compiling inline instructions with 16-bit ARM code. Reply-To: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00922.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/5836; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard Earnshaw To: "Baker, Rick" Cc: "'rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org'" , "'gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org'" , "'gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org'" Subject: Re: c++/5836: GCC 3.0.3 fails when compiling inline instructions with 16-bit ARM code. Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 13:42:48 +0000 > Sorry for the delay, I had to recreate the setup. The patch > help one of the problems mentioned with Thumb code and > -mlong-calls. I do not have time to verify it fixed all the > issues. Thanks, I'll close the PR. > > Tell me, how can I search for these issues on my own next time. > I did the usual searches and found no hits on this subject? > Not easily in this case. I happened to know that this had been solved recently, plus trying the test on the trunk build of the compiler confirmed that it was no-longer a problem. After that it was a matter of sleuthing out the patch that fixed it. > Anyways...thank-you for your time and effort. No problem. R.