From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6935 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2002 21:26:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6921 invoked by uid 71); 27 Mar 2002 21:26:02 -0000 Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 13:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020327212601.6920.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Tom Tromey Subject: Re: java/5986: SIGSEGV in __gcj_personality_v0 Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg01045.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR java/5986; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tom Tromey To: Jeff Sturm Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: java/5986: SIGSEGV in __gcj_personality_v0 Date: 27 Mar 2002 14:59:53 -0700 Jeff> Try this one. I've looked at this a little today. It looks like `finally' is miscompiled by the bytecode front end. Even this test fails for me when compiled from .class: public class CrashEH { public static void main (String[] args) throws Exception { try { throw new Exception(); } finally { System.out.println("cleanup"); } } } Tom