From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-16291-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4223 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2002 00:56:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4195 invoked by uid 71); 28 Mar 2002 00:56:00 -0000
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 16:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020328005600.4194.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: tromey@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: java/5986: SIGSEGV in __gcj_personality_v0
Reply-To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg01059.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR java/5986; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: apbianco@redhat.com
Cc: Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com>, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
        Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
Subject: Re: java/5986: SIGSEGV in __gcj_personality_v0
Date: 27 Mar 2002 18:25:48 -0700

 Alex> Per would know better, but this looks like a sane thing to do.
 
 Per, could you look at the patch in PR 5986?
 I can email it to you if you want.
 
 Thanks,
 Tom