From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4357 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2002 17:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4341 invoked by uid 71); 28 Mar 2002 17:26:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020328172601.4340.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Richard Henderson Subject: Re: c/3711: ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_1, at function.c:3880 Reply-To: Richard Henderson X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg01083.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/3711; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard Henderson To: Nicola Pero Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, GNUstep Developers Subject: Re: c/3711: ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_1, at function.c:3880 Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:24:13 -0800 On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 03:02:54PM +0000, Nicola Pero wrote: > Ok - would it make sense then to add a GCC extension allowing to do it ? No, because ... > Like telling the compiler - I want to call this method and here I put a > variable size struct but I want you to make the call as if it were a fixed > size struct of this size. ... that's what libffi is for. r~