From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22834 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2002 07:57:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22815 invoked by uid 61); 29 Mar 2002 07:57:19 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 23:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020329075719.22814.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, green@rhythm.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: rth@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, green@rhythm.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/1098: inconsisten fp behavior i386 vs. most others X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg01154.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: inconsisten fp behavior i386 vs. most others State-Changed-From-To: open->suspended State-Changed-By: rth State-Changed-When: Thu Mar 28 23:57:19 2002 State-Changed-Why: Yes, that would be nice. One can get that on P4 machines with gcc 3.1 with -mfpmath=sse, but that's not quite the same thing. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=1098