From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12210 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2002 08:20:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12180 invoked by uid 61); 29 Mar 2002 08:20:23 -0000 Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 00:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020329082023.12179.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, joshg@hf.intel.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rnesius@ichips.intel.com, tuan.nguyen@intel.com From: neil@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: neil@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, joshg@hf.intel.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rnesius@ichips.intel.com, tuan.nguyen@intel.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: preprocessor/6084: cpp Segmentation Fault X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg01160.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: cpp Segmentation Fault State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: neil State-Changed-When: Fri Mar 29 00:20:22 2002 State-Changed-Why: Changed to category preprocessor; not a front end issue. Quite a surpise to me, too. I take pride in cpp not segfaulting 8-) Could you give me a testcase? I can't reproduce it with the information supplied. Or, could you try 3.0.4? There was a segfault fixed in the later 3.0 cycle, triggered by a combination of command line options, but I'm not sure which 3.0.x got it. Judging by your command line, I suspect it is caused by a certain combination of switches; can you reproduce it on a simple file like #include or something? Alternatively, if you can't produce a simple testcase, but can get it to happen on Linux, then please send me the files so I can track this down, or tell me where it happens when you're debugging the cpp0 binary. Thanks! http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6084