From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7795 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2002 08:50:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7775 invoked by uid 61); 29 Mar 2002 08:50:40 -0000 Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 00:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020329085040.7774.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jason-gccprs@molenda.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: neil@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: neil@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jason-gccprs@molenda.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/5957: gcc accepts C99-only code even when -std=c89 arg used X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg01174.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: gcc accepts C99-only code even when -std=c89 arg used State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: neil State-Changed-When: Fri Mar 29 00:50:40 2002 State-Changed-Why: This is not a bug, it's the meaning of the options, though you may disagree with it. If you want a hard error, you need -pedantic-errors. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5957