From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18715 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2002 20:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18697 invoked by uid 71); 29 Mar 2002 20:16:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 12:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020329201601.18695.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Neil Booth Subject: Re: preprocessor/6084: cpp Segmentation Fault Reply-To: Neil Booth X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg01208.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/6084; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Neil Booth To: "Gerwin, Joshua A" Cc: "'neil@gcc.gnu.org'" , "'gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org'" , "'gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org'" , "'joshg@hf.intel.com'" , "'nobody@gcc.gnu.org'" , "'rnesius@ichips.intel.com'" , "Nguyen, Tuan" , "'gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org'" Subject: Re: preprocessor/6084: cpp Segmentation Fault Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 20:06:38 +0000 Gerwin, Joshua A wrote:- > A minor experiment in option removal shows that the problem is potentially > tied to the > -dD tag. Compare: > [...] > > A clue, no? A clue, but not much more. Sadly I can't reproduce the issue on x86 Linux. Would you mind running it through gdb, and giving a backtrace of the line it segfaults on, and any relevant-looking variables? Thanks, Neil.