From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8366 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2002 01:21:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8329 invoked by uid 61); 30 Mar 2002 01:21:50 -0000 Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 17:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020330012150.8328.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org, stefaandr@hotmail.com From: rth@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org, stefaandr@hotmail.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/5851: tmp-dum.c:2: Internal error: Segmentation fault X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg01226.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: tmp-dum.c:2: Internal error: Segmentation fault Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->rth Responsible-Changed-By: rth Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Mar 29 17:21:49 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: . State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: rth State-Changed-When: Fri Mar 29 17:21:49 2002 State-Changed-Why: Can't reproduce with gcc 3.1 prerelease. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5851 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28785 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2002 00:16:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28750 invoked by uid 71); 31 Mar 2002 00:16:01 -0000 Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 16:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020331001601.28735.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: rth@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Stefaan De Roeck" Subject: Re: target/5851: tmp-dum.c:2: Internal error: Segmentation fault Reply-To: "Stefaan De Roeck" X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg01274.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/5851; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Stefaan De Roeck" To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, stefaandr@hotmail.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: target/5851: tmp-dum.c:2: Internal error: Segmentation fault Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 00:12:55
May I ask what version of binutils you use? With 2.9.1 I get some kind of "Unknown pseudo-op: '.section'" when assembling _muldi3.o, with the latest release or the cvs I get errors when compiling the assembler for alpha-vms. (I tried gcc-20020325, I hope that's what you meant with 3.1 prerelease...)
 
Thanks, and sorry for any ignorance, I'm new to this :)
 
Stefaan
 
 
>From: rth@gcc.gnu.org
>Reply-To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org, stefaandr@hotmail.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
>To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org, stefaandr@hotmail.com
>Subject: Re: target/5851: tmp-dum.c:2: Internal error: Segmentation fault
>Date: 30 Mar 2002 01:21:50 -0000
>Received: from [209.249.29.67] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBE6E5FBF005040043221D1F91D430A480; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 17:28:31 -0800
>Received: (qmail 8329 invoked by uid 61); 30 Mar 2002 01:21:50 -0000
>From anonymous@sources.redhat.com Fri, 29 Mar 2002 17:29:09 -0800
>Message-ID: <20020330012150.8328.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
>X-Mailer: gnatsweb 2.9.3
>
>Synopsis: tmp-dum.c:2: Internal error: Segmentation fault
>
>Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->rth
>Responsible-Changed-By: rth
>Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Mar 29 17:21:49 2002
>Responsible-Changed-Why:
> .
>State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
>State-Changed-By: rth
>State-Changed-When: Fri Mar 29 17:21:49 2002
>State-Changed-Why:
> Can't reproduce with gcc 3.1 prerelease.
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5851


MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here
From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2431 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2002 00:36:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2403 invoked by uid 71); 31 Mar 2002 00:36:01 -0000 Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 16:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020331003601.2402.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: rth@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Richard Henderson Subject: Re: target/5851: tmp-dum.c:2: Internal error: Segmentation fault Reply-To: Richard Henderson X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg01277.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/5851; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard Henderson To: Stefaan De Roeck Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/5851: tmp-dum.c:2: Internal error: Segmentation fault Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 16:28:49 -0800 [ Please try to avoid sending html mail. It doesn't come out well once it gets frobbed by gnats, and it gets black-holed by my spam filters. ] On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 12:16:01AM -0000, Stefaan De Roeck wrote: > May I ask what version of binutils you use? With 2.9.1 I get some kind > of "Unknown pseudo-op: '.section'" when assembling _muldi3.o, with the > latest release or the cvs I get errors when compiling the assembler for > alpha-vms. (I tried gcc-20020325, I hope that's what you meant with 3.1 > prerelease...) Yes, that's what I meant by 3.1 prerelease. As yet, I'm not using *any* version of binutils. If the compiler itself is segfaulting (as you reported) I don't need to. So: was the original problem a crash in the compiler or elsewhere? r~ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10808 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2002 23:44:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10784 invoked by uid 61); 31 Mar 2002 23:43:59 -0000 Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 15:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020331234359.10783.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org, stefaandr@hotmail.com From: rth@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org, stefaandr@hotmail.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/5851: tmp-dum.c:2: Internal error: Segmentation fault X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg01304.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: tmp-dum.c:2: Internal error: Segmentation fault State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: rth State-Changed-When: Sun Mar 31 15:43:59 2002 State-Changed-Why: From: Stefaan De Roeck Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 00:34:19 +0200 (CEST) The original problem was indeed a crash in the compiler, as I reported. This probleem seems to be solved in the prerelease. My next stop will be the binutils-bugreport mailinglist then. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5851