From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2431 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2002 00:36:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2403 invoked by uid 71); 31 Mar 2002 00:36:01 -0000 Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 16:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020331003601.2402.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: rth@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Richard Henderson Subject: Re: target/5851: tmp-dum.c:2: Internal error: Segmentation fault Reply-To: Richard Henderson X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg01277.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/5851; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard Henderson To: Stefaan De Roeck Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/5851: tmp-dum.c:2: Internal error: Segmentation fault Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 16:28:49 -0800 [ Please try to avoid sending html mail. It doesn't come out well once it gets frobbed by gnats, and it gets black-holed by my spam filters. ] On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 12:16:01AM -0000, Stefaan De Roeck wrote: > May I ask what version of binutils you use? With 2.9.1 I get some kind > of "Unknown pseudo-op: '.section'" when assembling _muldi3.o, with the > latest release or the cvs I get errors when compiling the assembler for > alpha-vms. (I tried gcc-20020325, I hope that's what you meant with 3.1 > prerelease...) Yes, that's what I meant by 3.1 prerelease. As yet, I'm not using *any* version of binutils. If the compiler itself is segfaulting (as you reported) I don't need to. So: was the original problem a crash in the compiler or elsewhere? r~