From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-16657-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22054 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2002 21:56:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22033 invoked by uid 71); 2 Apr 2002 21:56:02 -0000
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 13:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020402215602.22032.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: libstdc++/4367: Sparc atomicity.h routines can lock up on some OS.
Reply-To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00120.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/4367; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Eric Norum <eric.norum@usask.ca>
Cc: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
   nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/4367: Sparc atomicity.h routines can lock up on some OS.
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 13:49:23 -0800

 On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 09:32:17AM -0600, Eric Norum wrote:
 > I don't know enough about the sparc architecture to be able to 
 > say if the any of the techniques used in the other source files could be 
 > used to replace the existing sparc code.
 
 Not for sparc v7.
 
 
 r~