From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6496 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2002 07:37:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6467 invoked by uid 61); 3 Apr 2002 07:37:21 -0000 Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 23:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020403073721.6466.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: rth@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/4280: Misplaced warnings with optimized `foo / 0.0' X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00174.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Misplaced warnings with optimized `foo / 0.0' State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: rth State-Changed-When: Tue Apr 2 23:37:20 2002 State-Changed-Why: Misplaced warnings produced under simplify_binary_real during cse_insn. We don't have a way to pass down some notion of the current insn being considered here, so no way to get hold of the proper line number. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=4280